<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Say ‘Hi!’ to Hydropower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dofonline.co.uk/blogs/eco-finance/carbon-emmissions/germany-france-recession-5454444/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/eco-finance/carbon-emmissions/germany-france-recession-5454444/</link>
	<description>Joining the dots between cost and carbon reduction for finance directors</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wognum</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/eco-finance/carbon-emmissions/germany-france-recession-5454444/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wognum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/eco-finance/?p=71#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>That's exactly the point, Hydro.

There are already working hydro plants, but only in Scotland (5 to date, generating just under a combined 1,200MW).

The hydropower schemes discussed in the article are mini-hydro projects - much cheaper to implement and can generate power from rivers and weirs, so 'do-able' everywhere and anywhere in the UK apart from the very flattest land (looks like Norfolk might miss out, but otherwise we're good to go!).

Environmental impact has been studied over the past 5 years and these schemes can be implemented without any negative impact to the environment... even the Anglers Association no longer has a problem with this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly the point, Hydro.</p>
<p>There are already working hydro plants, but only in Scotland (5 to date, generating just under a combined 1,200MW).</p>
<p>The hydropower schemes discussed in the article are mini-hydro projects - much cheaper to implement and can generate power from rivers and weirs, so &#8216;do-able&#8217; everywhere and anywhere in the UK apart from the very flattest land (looks like Norfolk might miss out, but otherwise we&#8217;re good to go!).</p>
<p>Environmental impact has been studied over the past 5 years and these schemes can be implemented without any negative impact to the environment&#8230; even the Anglers Association no longer has a problem with this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hydro</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/eco-finance/carbon-emmissions/germany-france-recession-5454444/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>Hydro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/eco-finance/?p=71#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>Hydro??? The problem here is there are no sites in the UK where it can be implemented. You need vast amounts of space to dam in order for it to be viable. Scotland has the mountains and the requisite topography but it still causes massive environmental impact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydro??? The problem here is there are no sites in the UK where it can be implemented. You need vast amounts of space to dam in order for it to be viable. Scotland has the mountains and the requisite topography but it still causes massive environmental impact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

