Breaking finance and business news, tax information, jobs and more for finance directors and senior finance professionals.

The case was due to begin on Wednesday at the International Dispute Resolution Centre, but was postponed due to the Judge's prior commitments running over.

The purpose of the application is to get a ruling on whether the provisions of the UTCCRs (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations) that deal with unfairness, apply to unauthorised overdraft charges, and will not address whether terms and conditions or specific charges of individual banks are unfair.

The OFT said, however, that it continued to analyse information supplied by the banks. It added that further information on the investigation into unfairness would be published after the judgment had been delivered and OFT had had time to consider any implications.

The application for the declaration is brought against Abbey National plc, Barclays Bank plc, Clydesdale Bank plc, HBOS plc, HSBC Bank plc, Lloyds TSB Bank plc, Nationwide Building Society and Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.

The hearing is expected to last three weeks with judgment to follow some time later.

The OFT has published more information about the case and has a website section that explains more about the work on bank personal current accounts, available at the link below.

Related articles

• Bank charges test case begins
• OFT rejects banks' defence on charges
• Banking clients wants better integration
• Banks could face exodus over charges
• UK financial services hit record high
• Credit card companies lose refund case
• Bank charges test case 'misleads the public'
• Abandon plans to lift banking price controls says small business
• SME fury after banks are 'let off'
• Competition Commission lifts price controls on SME banks
• SMEs told to shop around for banks

Related links

• Office for Fair Trading
• HM Courts Service